SEC Filing | MATSON

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________________ to _________________

Commission file number 0-565

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Hawaii	99-0032630
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

P. O. Box 3440, Honolulu, Hawaii 822 Bishop Street, Honolulu, Hawaii (Address of principal executive offices)	9680l 96813 (Zip Code)

(808) 525-6611

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address, and former

fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x

No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o

No x

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2007:

42,791,077

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(In millions, except per-share amounts)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Revenue:
Operating revenue	$	434.7		$	421.2		$	1,244.9		$	1,195.9

Costs and Expenses:
Costs of goods sold, services and rentals		351.3			342.1			998.9			981.5
Selling, general and administrative		39.0			34.4			117.1			106.5
Operating costs and expenses		390.3			376.5			1,116.0			1,088.0

Operating Income		44.4			44.7			128.9			107.9
Other Income and (Expense):
Gain on insurance settlement		--			0.5			--			0.5
Equity in (loss) income of real estate affiliates		4.0			(1.4	)		15.6			10.8
Interest income		1.0			1.0			2.7			5.9
Interest expense		(4.8	)		(4.0	)		(13.2	)		(10.2	)
Income Before Taxes		44.6			40.8			134.0			114.9
Income taxes		(17.8	)		(15.3	)		(52.0	)		(43.0	)
Income From Continuing Operations		26.8			25.5			82.0			71.9
Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)		22.3			2.4			23.8			23.6

Net Income	$	49.1		$	27.9		$	105.8		$	95.5

Basic Earnings Per Share:
Continuing operations	$	0.63		$	0.60		$	1.93		$	1.66
Discontinued operations		0.52			0.06			0.55			0.54
Net income	$	1.15		$	0.66		$	2.48		$	2.20

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Continuing operations	$	0.63		$	0.60		$	1.91		$	1.64
Discontinued operations		0.51			0.05			0.55			0.54
Net income	$	1.14		$	0.65		$	2.46		$	2.18

Average Number of Basic Shares Outstanding		42.6			42.5			42.6			43.5
Average Number of Dilutive Shares Outstanding		43.0			42.8			43.0			43.8

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Business Segment Data, Net Income

(In millions)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Revenue:
Transportation:
Ocean transportation	$	259.9		$	243.2		$	744.6		$	706.1
Logistics services		110.4			113.1			325.7			337.9
Real Estate:
Leasing		26.3			25.5			81.5			74.5
Sales		78.5			5.0			85.4			65.6
Less amounts reported in discontinued operations		(75.3	)		(4.7	)		(79.2	)		(71.2	)
Agribusiness		37.3			41.8			93.1			95.1
Reconciling Items		(2.4	)		(2.7	)		(6.2	)		(12.1	)
Total revenue	$	434.7		$	421.2		$	1,244.9		$	1,195.9

Operating Profit, Net Income:
Transportation:
Ocean transportation	$	38.6		$	34.2		$	96.5		$	76.9
Logistics services		6.0			5.1			17.2			15.1
Real Estate:
Leasing		12.2			12.5			39.5			36.8
Sales		37.9			1.2			51.3			39.2
Less amounts reported in discontinued operations		(36.1	)		(3.8	)		(38.6	)		(37.8	)
Agribusiness		(3.2	)		0.6			0.9			10.2
Total operating profit		55.4			49.8			166.8			140.4
Interest Expense		(4.8	)		(4.0	)		(13.2	)		(10.2	)
General Corporate Expenses		(6.0	)		(5.0	)		(19.6	)		(15.3	)
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes		44.6			40.8			134.0			114.9
Income Taxes		(17.8	)		(15.3	)		(52.0	)		(43.0	)
Income From Continuing Operations		26.8			25.5			82.0			71.9
Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)		22.3			2.4			23.8			23.6
Net Income	$	49.1		$	27.9		$	105.8		$	95.5

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In millions)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	29		$	45
Accounts and notes receivable, net		186			178
Inventories		26			19
Deferred income taxes		7			10
Prepaid expenses and other assets		37			33
Total current assets		285			285
Investments		167			149
Real Estate Developments		235			147
Property, at cost		2,513			2,485
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		1,039			986
Property – net		1,474			1,499
Pension Assets		60			56
Other Assets		171			115
Total	$	2,392		$	2,251

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt	$	39		$	41
Accounts payable		145			136
Other		78			80
Total current liabilities		262			257
Long-term Liabilities:
Long-term debt		437			401
Deferred income taxes		454			442
Liability for benefit plans		54			52
Other		80			72
Total long-term liabilities		1,025			967
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders’ Equity:
Capital stock		35			35
Additional capital		197			179
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(20	)		(19	)
Retained earnings		904			843
Cost of treasury stock		(11	)		(11	)
Total shareholders' equity		1,105			1,027
Total	$	2,392		$	2,251

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In millions)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2007			2006

Cash Flows from Operating Activities	$	78		$	85

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures		(72	)		(255	)
Proceeds from disposal of property and other assets		8			43
Deposits into Capital Construction Fund		(29	)		(62	)
Withdrawals from Capital Construction Fund		23			155
Reductions in Investments		1			43
Increase in Investments		(18	)		(29	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(87	)		(105	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt		100			140
Payments of long-term debt		(71	)		(80	)
Proceeds (payments) from short-term borrowings, net		4			47
Proceeds from issuances of capital stock, including excess tax benefit		8			4
Repurchase capital stock		(12	)		(72	)
Dividends paid		(36	)		(32	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(7	)		7

Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	(16	)	$	(13	)

Other Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	(9	)	$	(12	)
Income taxes paid	$	(39	)	$	(50	)

Other Non-cash Information:
Depreciation expense	$	69		$	62
Tax-deferred property sales	$	72		$	58
Tax-deferred property purchases	$	(12	)	$	(33	)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(1)

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited. Because of the nature of the Company’s operations, the results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. While these statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for fair presentation of the results of the interim period, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Therefore, the interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

(2)

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”), which is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 159 provides an option for companies to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments. Under SFAS No. 159, fair value would be used for both the initial and subsequent measurement of the designated assets, liabilities and commitments, with the changes in value recognized in earnings. At this time, the Company has not completed its review and assessment of the impact upon adoption of SFAS No. 159.

In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 requires companies to recognize the income tax benefit realized from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings and paid to employees for nonvested equity-classified employee share-based payment awards as an increase to additional paid-in capital. EITF 06-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company does not expect that EITF 06-11 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

(3)	Commitments and Contingencies: Commitments and financial arrangements that are not recorded on the Company’s balance sheet at September 30, 2007, other than operating lease obligations, included the following (in millions):

Guarantee of HS&TC debt

(a)

$19

Standby letters of credit

(b)

$23

Bonds

(c)

$21

Benefit plan withdrawal obligations

(d)

$61

These amounts are not recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and it is not expected that the Company or its subsidiaries will be called upon to advance funds under these commitments.

(a)

The Company is contingently liable for up to $21.5 million based on a portion of amounts outstanding under a $30 million Hawaiian Sugar & Transportation Cooperative (“HS&TC”) revolving credit line. This guarantee was issued before December 31, 2002, and therefore, is not subject to the scope of FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” As of September 30, 2007, $19 million was borrowed under HS&TC’s facility.

(b)

Consists of letters of credit, totaling approximately $23 million, of which $18 million enable the Company to qualify as a self-insurer for state and federal workers’ compensation liabilities. This balance also includes approximately $5 million of letters of credit related to certain of the Company’s real estate projects.

(c)

Consists of approximately $6 million in U.S. customs bonds, approximately $14 million related to real estate construction projects in Hawaii, and approximately $1 million related to transportation and other matters.

(d)

Represents the withdrawal liabilities for multiemployer pension plans, in which Matson is a participant. The withdrawal liability aggregated approximately $61 million as of the most recent valuation dates. Management has no present intention of withdrawing from, and does not anticipate termination of any of the aforementioned plans.

Indemnity Agreements: For certain real estate joint ventures, the Company may be obligated under bond indemnities to complete construction of the real estate development if the joint venture does not perform. These indemnities are designed to protect the surety or lender. To date, none of these indemnities has been called upon. The Company accounts for these indemnities in accordance with FIN 45. The fair values of the liabilities recorded by the Company in connection with the indemnities were not material.

Completion Guarantees: For certain real estate joint ventures, the Company may be required to perform work to complete construction if the joint venture fails to complete construction. These guarantees are intended to assure the joint venture’s lender that the project will be completed as represented to the lender. To date, none of these guarantees has been called upon. The Company accounts for these completion guarantees in accordance with FIN 45. The fair values of the liabilities recorded by the Company in connection with the completion guarantees were not material.

Financing Agreement: On April 20, 2006, the Company entered into a three-year unsecured note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, “Prudential”) under which the Company may issue notes in an aggregate amount up to $400 million less the sum of all principal amounts then outstanding on any notes issued by the Company or any of its subsidiaries to Prudential. In March 2007, the Company

received $50 million that represented the second of three scheduled draws under the facility. In June 2007, the Company received $25 million that represented the third and final draw of three scheduled draws under the facility. As of September 30, 2007 approximately $109 million was available under the facility.

Litigation: The Company and certain subsidiaries are parties to various legal actions and are contingently liable in connection with claims and contracts arising in the normal course of business, the outcome of which, in the opinion of management after consultation with legal counsel, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

(4)	Earnings Per Share (“EPS”): The denominator used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007	2006	2007	2006
Denominator for basic EPS – weighted average shares	42.6	42.5	42.6	43.5
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee/director stock options, non-vested common stock, and restricted stock units	0.4	0.3	0.4	0.3
Denominator for diluted EPS – weighted average shares	43.0	42.8	43.0	43.8

Basic earnings per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding adjusted by the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding had the potentially dilutive common shares been issued. Potentially dilutive shares of common stock include non-qualified stock options, non-vested common stock, and restricted stock units.

The computation of average dilutive shares outstanding excluded non-qualified stock options to purchase approximately 0.2 million shares of common stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The number of non-qualified stock options excluded from the computation for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was not significant. The computation of average dilutive shares outstanding excluded non-qualified stock options to purchase approximately 0.4 million and 0.2 million shares of common stock for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. These options were excluded because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the periods presented and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive to diluted EPS.

(5)

Share-Based Compensation: On April 26, 2007, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”) which serves as a successor to the 1998 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the Restricted Stock Bonus Plan and the Non-Employee Director Stock Retainer Plan (the “Predecessor Plans”). Under the 2007 Plan, 2,215,000 shares of common stock were initially reserved for

issuance. The approval of the 2007 Plan did not affect any options or stock issuances outstanding under the Predecessor Plans. To the extent any of those options subsequently terminate unexercised or those stock issuances are forfeited prior to vesting, the number of shares of common stock subject to those terminated options, together with the forfeited shares, will be added to the share reserve available for issuance under the 2007 Plan, up to an additional 750,000 shares. However, no further awards may be made under the Predecessor Plans subsequent to the approval of the 2007 Plan.

The 2007 Plan consists of four separate incentive compensation programs: (i) the discretionary grant program, (ii) the stock issuance program, (iii) the incentive bonus program and (iv) the automatic grant program for the non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors. Share-based compensation is generally awarded under three of the four programs. Those three programs are more fully described below.

Discretionary Grant Program – Under the Discretionary Grant Program, stock options may be granted with an exercise price no less than 100% of the fair market value (defined as the closing market price) of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. Options generally become exercisable ratably over three years and have a maximum contractual term of 10 years. The Company estimates the grant-date fair value of its stock options using a Black-Scholes valuation model.

Stock Issuance Program – Under the Stock Issuance Program, shares of common stock or restricted stock units may be granted. Generally, time-based equity awards vest ratably over three years and performance-based equity awards vest after one year, provided that certain performance targets are achieved.

Automatic Grant Program - The Automatic Grant Program supersedes and replaces the Company’s 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and the Non-Employee Director Stock Retainer Plan. At each annual shareholder meeting, non-employee directors will receive an award of restricted stock units that entitle the holder to an equivalent number of shares of common stock upon vesting. Awards of restricted stock units granted under the program generally vest ratably over three years.

The shares of common stock authorized to be issued under the 2007 Plan may be drawn from shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock or from shares of its common stock that the Company acquires, including shares purchased on the open market or in private transactions.

The Company’s Predecessor Plans are more fully described in its most recent Form 10-K and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

On January 24, 2007, the Company granted non-qualified stock options to purchase 279,739 shares of the Company’s common stock under the Predecessor Plans. The grant-date fair value of each stock option granted, using a Black-Scholes valuation model, was $10.91 using the following weighted average assumptions: volatility of 19.5%, risk-free interest rate of 4.8%,

dividend yield of 2.1%, and expected term of 5.8 years. On June 27, 2007, the Company granted non-qualified stock options to purchase 3,132 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2007 Plan. The grant-date fair value of each stock option granted, using a Black-Scholes valuation model, was $11.75 using the following weighted average assumptions: volatility of 19.0%, risk-free interest rate of 5.0%, dividend yield of 2.2%, and expected term of 5.8 years.

Activity in the Company’s stock option plans for the first three quarters of 2007 was as follows (in thousands, except weighted average exercise price and weighted average contractual life):

		Employee Plans				Directors’ Plans						Weighted	Weighted
						1998		1989				Average	Average	Aggregate
	2007	1998		1989		Directors’		Directors’		Total		Exercise	Contractual	Intrinsic
	Plan	Plan		Plan		Plan		Plan		Shares		Price	Life	Value

Outstanding December 31, 2006	--	1,234		27		266		30		1,557		$ 34.47
Granted	3	280		--		--		--		283		$ 48.24
Exercised	--	(150	)	(14	)	(21	)	(21	)	(206	)	$ 28.75
Forfeited and expired	--	(3	)	--		--		--		(3	)	$ 38.89
Outstanding September 30, 2007	3	1,361		13		245		9		1,631		$ 37.57	6.4	$ 20,535

Exercisable September 30, 2007	--	907		13		184		9		1,113		$ 32.54	5.3	$ 19,440

The following table summarizes non-vested common stock and restricted stock unit activity through September 30, 2007 (in thousands, except weighted-average, grant-date fair value amounts):

	Predecessor
	Plans		2007
	Non-Vested	Weighted	Plan	Weighted
	Common	Average	Restricted	Average
	Stock	Grant-Date	Stock	Grant-Date
	Shares	Fair Value	Units	Fair Value

Outstanding December 31, 2006	274	$ 47.28	--	$ --
Granted	166	$ 48.19	17	$ 54.27
Vested	(150)	$ 48.51	--	$ --
Outstanding September 30, 2007	290	$ 47.16	17	$ 54.27

A portion of the above awards are time-based awards that vest ratably over three years. The remaining portion of the awards represents performance-based awards that vest after one year, provided certain performance targets are achieved.

A summary of the compensation cost and other measures related to share-based payments is as follows (in millions):

	Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Share-based expense (net of estimated forfeitures):
Stock options	$	0.7		$	0.7		$	2.2		$	2.1
Non-vested common stock/Restricted stock units		2.8			1.5			8.0			4.1
Total share-based expense		3.5			2.2			10.2			6.2
Total recognized tax benefit		(0.9	)		(0.5	)		(2.5	)		(1.5	)
Share-based expense (net of tax)	$	2.6		$	1.7		$	7.7		$	4.7

(6)

Accounting for and Classification of Discontinued Operations: As required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”), the sales of certain income-producing assets are classified as discontinued operations if (i) the operations and cash flows of the assets can be clearly distinguished from the remaining assets of the Company, (ii) the cash flows that are specific to the assets sold have been, or will be, eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company, (iii) the Company will not have a significant continuing involvement in the operations of the assets sold, and (iv) the amount is considered material. Certain assets that are “held for sale,” based on the likelihood and intention of selling the property within 12 months, are also treated as discontinued operations. Depreciation on these assets is discontinued upon reclassification. Sales of land, residential houses, and office condominium units are generally considered inventory and are not included in discontinued operations. In the third quarter of 2007, discontinued operations consisted of the revenues and expenses of land leased to a retail tenant on Oahu and two commercial properties on Maui that were sold. In addition, two additional commercial properties on Maui and a commercial property in California have been classified as discontinued operations because of the Company’s plan to sell these properties. In the third quarter of 2006, the revenue and operating profit of two retail centers in Phoenix, Arizona, an office building on Maui, and several commercial parcels in Hawaii were included in discontinued operations.

Discontinued operations were as follows (in millions):

	Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006

Discontinued Operations (net of tax):
Sales of Assets	$	21.6	$	1.5	$	21.6	$	20.2
Leasing Operations		0.7		0.9		2.2		3.4
Total	$	22.3	$	2.4	$	23.8	$	23.6

(7)

Other Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was as follows (in millions):

	Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2007		2006		2007			2006

Net Income	$	49.1	$	27.9	$	105.8		$	95.5
Company’s share of investee’s minimum pension liability adjustment		--		--		(1.1	)		0.1
Other		0.7		--		0.7			(0.1	)
Comprehensive Income	$	49.8	$	27.9	$	105.4		$	95.5

(8)

Pension and Post-retirement Plans: The Company has defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all non-bargaining unit and certain bargaining unit employees. The Company also has unfunded non-qualified plans that provide benefits in excess of the amounts permitted to be paid under the provisions of the tax law to participants in qualified plans. The assumptions related to discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on invested plan assets, salary increases, age, mortality and health care cost trend rates, along with other factors, are used in determining the assets, liabilities and expenses associated with pension benefits. Management reviews the assumptions annually with its independent actuaries, taking into consideration existing and future economic conditions and the Company’s intentions with respect to these plans. Management believes that its assumptions and estimates for 2007 are reasonable. Different assumptions, however, could result in material changes to the assets, obligations and costs associated with benefit plans.

The Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income) for the third quarters of 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in millions):

	Pension Benefits						Post-retirement Benefits
	2007			2006			2007			2006

Service Cost	$	1.8		$	1.9		$	0.2		$	0.2
Interest Cost		4.4			4.2			0.8			0.8
Expected Return on Plan Assets		(7.2	)		(6.6	)		--			--
Amortization of Prior Service Cost		0.1			0.1			--			--
Amortization of Net (Gain) Loss		--			0.4			(0.1	)		0.3
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income)	$	(0.9	)	$	--		$	0.9		$	1.3

The Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income) for the first nine months of 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in millions):

	Pension Benefits						Post-retirement Benefits
	2007			2006			2007			2006

Service Cost	$	5.4		$	5.6		$	0.6		$	0.6
Interest Cost		13.1			12.4			2.3			2.4
Expected Return on Plan Assets		(21.6	)		(19.6	)		--			--
Amortization of Prior Service Cost		0.3			0.3			--			--
Amortization of Net (Gain) Loss		--			1.2			(0.3	)		0.9
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income)	$	(2.8	)	$	(0.1	)	$	2.6		$	3.9

The 2007 return on plan assets is expected to exceed the sum of the service cost, interest cost and amortization components, resulting in an expected net periodic pension credit of approximately $3.8 million for 2007. No contributions to the Company’s pension plans are expected to be required during 2007.

(9)

Income Taxes: The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (“FIN 48”), and FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 48-1, Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FSP 48-1”), an amendment to FIN 48, effective January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a decrease of $2.3 million in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, and a corresponding increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. As of the date of adoption, and after the impact of recognizing the decrease in liability noted above, the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits and related gross accrued interest totaled $10.0 million. Of this total, $8.0 million ($5.8 million net of the federal benefit on state issues) represents the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods, and $0.7 million represents gross accrued interest.

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, the gross unrecognized tax benefit was increased by $1.7 million for uncertain tax positions, and decreased by $2.1 million due principally to the effective settlement of state tax issues. Approximately $0.5 million of the net decrease had a favorable impact on the Company’s effective tax rate for the year.

The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. To the extent interest and penalties are not ultimately assessed with respect to the settlement of uncertain tax positions, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision. There were no amounts accrued as penalties.

The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax audits for years before 2004. Substantially all material state, local, and foreign income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2001.

The effective income tax rate for the full year is expected to be lower than the rate applicable to the third quarter of 2007 because of the expected favorable impact arising from the recognition of certain unrecognized tax benefits in the fourth quarter of 2007.

(10)	Subsequent Events:

Subsequent to the third quarter and through to the effective date of this filing, the Company repurchased 32,890 shares of its common stock at an average price of $48.70 through open market purchases. Year-to-date, 295,772 shares were repurchased at an average price of $48.96, leaving approximately 1,704,000 shares available for repurchase under a two million share authorization that was approved by the A&B Board of Directors in October 2006. This authorization expires December 31, 2008.

On October 25, 2007, the A&B Board of Directors approved the purchase of Heritage Business Park, a seven-building industrial property (the “Property”) located in Dallas, Texas, for $102 million. The Property contains a total of 1.3 million square feet of leasable warehouse/flex space and 28 acres of fully entitled, developable land that could accommodate approximately 430,000 square feet of additional leasable space. The purchase price for the property will be principally financed with $72 million of tax-deferred 1031 funds related to property sales that occurred during the quarter. The remaining purchase price of $30 million is expected to be funded with tax-deferred proceeds from planned future property sales that will be treated as reverse-1031 sales, anticipated 1033 condemnation proceeds, insurance proceeds to be received that are expected to qualify for tax-deferred reinvestment, and, to the extent not available, with a combination of available cash and/or debt.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company, from time to time, may make or may have made certain forward-looking statements, whether orally or in writing, such as forecasts and projections of the Company’s future performance or statements of management’s plans and objectives. These statements are “forward-looking” statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may be contained in, among other things, Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, such as the Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, the Annual Report to Shareholders, press releases made by the Company, the Company’s Internet Web sites (including Web sites of its subsidiaries), and oral statements made by the officers of the Company. Except for historical information contained in these written or oral communications, such communications contain forward-looking statements. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for the Company to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on the Company’s business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Accordingly, forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of future results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the statements, including, but not limited to the factors that are described in Part I, Item 1A under the caption of “Risk Factors” of the Company’s 2006 annual report on Form 10-K. The Company is not required, and undertakes no obligation, to revise or update forward-looking statements or any factors that may affect actual results, whether as a result of new information, future events, or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.

OVERVIEW

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is designed to provide a discussion of the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect its future results from the perspective of management. The discussion that follows is intended to provide information that will assist in understanding the changes in the Company’s financial statements from period to period, the primary factors that accounted for those changes, and how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect the Company’s financial statements. MD&A is provided as a supplement to the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes herein, and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and its accompanying notes as well as the Company’s reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K and other publicly available information. MD&A is presented in the following sections:

•

Business Overview

•

Consolidated Results of Operations

•

Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment

•

Liquidity and Capital Resources

•

Business Outlook

•

Other Matters

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (“A&B”), founded in 1870, is a multi-industry corporation headquartered in Honolulu that operates in five segments in three businesses—Transportation, Real Estate, and Agribusiness.

Transportation: The Transportation business consists of ocean transportation and logistics service segments. The Ocean Transportation segment is an asset-based business that derives its revenue primarily through the carriage of containerized freight between various U.S. Pacific Coast, Hawaii, Guam, China and other Pacific island ports. Additionally, the Ocean Transportation segment has a 35 percent interest in an entity that provides terminal and stevedoring services at U.S. Pacific Coast facilities.

The Logistics Services segment is a non-asset based business that is a provider of domestic and international rail intermodal service (“Intermodal”), long-haul and regional highway brokerage, specialized hauling, flat-bed and project work, less-than-truckload, and expedited/air freight services (collectively “Highway”).

Real Estate: The Real Estate business consists of two segments, both of which have operations in Hawaii and on the U.S. mainland. The Real Estate Sales segment generates its revenues through the development and sale of land and commercial and residential properties. The Real Estate Leasing segment owns, operates, and manages retail, office, and industrial properties.

Agribusiness: Agribusiness, which contains one segment, produces bulk raw sugar, specialty food-grade sugars, and molasses; produces, markets, and distributes roasted coffee and green coffee; provides general trucking services, mobile equipment maintenance, and repair services; and generates and sells, to the extent not used in the Company’s operations, electricity.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated – Third quarter of 2007 compared with 2006

	Quarter Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Operating Revenue	$	434.7		$	421.2		3	%
Operating Costs and Expenses		390.3			376.5		4	%
Operating Income		44.4			44.7		-1	%
Other Income and (Expense)		0.2			(3.9	)	NM
Income Before Taxes		44.6			40.8		9	%
Income Taxes		(17.8	)		(15.3	)	16	%
Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)		22.3			2.4		9	X
Net Income	$	49.1		$	27.9		76	%

Basic Earnings per Share	$	1.15		$	0.66		74	%
Diluted Earnings per Share	$	1.14		$	0.65		75	%

Operating revenue for the third quarter of 2007 increased $13.5 million, or 3 percent, compared with the third quarter of 2006. This increase was due principally to $16.7 million higher revenue for ocean transportation, $2.3 million higher revenue from real estate sales (after excluding real estate sales revenue from assets classified as discontinued operations) and $1.5 million higher revenue from real estate leasing (after excluding leasing revenue from assets classified as discontinued operations), partially offset by $4.5 million lower revenue for Agribusiness, $2.7 million lower logistics services revenue. The reasons for the revenue growth are described below, by business segment, in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment.

Operating costs and expenses for the third quarter of 2007 increased $13.8 million, or 4 percent, compared with the third quarter of 2006. The increase in operating costs and expenses was due principally to $5.1 million in higher operating costs for ocean transportation, $4.6 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily related to personnel costs, and $4.5 million increase in real estate operating costs and expenses. The reasons for the operating cost and expense changes are described below, by business segment, in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment.

Other income and (expense) increased $4.1 million, primarily due to $5.4 million in higher real estate joint venture earnings recorded in the third quarter of 2007.

Income taxes for the third quarter of 2007 were higher than the third quarter of 2006 on an absolute and percentage basis due to higher income and a change in the effective income tax rate. The higher effective income tax rate for the third quarter of 2007 was principally due to higher state income taxes, higher tax-deductible appreciated land donations in 2006, an increase in certain non-deductible expenses, and lower Medicare-D benefits in 2007.

Consolidated – First nine months of 2007 compared with 2006

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Operating Revenue	$	1,244.9		$	1,195.9		4	%
Operating Costs and Expenses		1,116.0			1,088.0		3	%
Operating Income		128.9			107.9		19	%
Other Income and (Expense)		5.1			7.0		-27	%
Income Before Taxes		134.0			114.9		17	%
Income Taxes		(52.0	)		(43.0	)	21	%
Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)		23.8			23.6		1	%
Net Income	$	105.8		$	95.5		11	%

Basic Earnings per Share	$	2.48		$	2.20		13	%
Diluted Earnings per Share	$	2.46		$	2.18		13	%

Operating revenue for the first nine months of 2007 increased $49.0 million, or 4 percent, compared with the same period in 2006. This increase was due principally to $38.5 million higher revenue for ocean transportation, $10.6 million higher revenue from real estate leasing (after excluding leasing revenue from assets classified as discontinued operations), $8.3 million in higher revenue from real estate sales (after excluding real estate sales revenue from assets classified as discontinued operations), partially offset by $12.2 million lower logistics services revenue and $2.0 million in lower revenue for Agribusiness. The reasons for the revenue growth are described below, by business segment, in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment.

Operating costs and expenses for the first nine months of 2007 increased $28.0 million, or 3 percent, compared with the same period in 2006 due to $10.6 million increase in selling, general and administrative costs, $8.1 million in higher costs for the real estate business, and $7.5 million in higher production costs for Agribusiness, partially offset by $1.8 million in lower costs for ocean transportation. The reasons for the operating cost and expense changes are described below, by business segment, in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment.

Other income and (expenses) decreased $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2007 compared with the same period in 2006, due primarily to $3.2 million in lower interest income, $3.0 million in higher interest expense, partially offset by $4.8 million in higher joint venture earnings.

Income taxes in the first nine months of 2007 were higher than the same period in 2006 due primarily to the same factors cited for the third quarter increase.

ANALYSIS OF OPERATING REVENUE AND PROFIT BY SEGMENT

TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS

Ocean Transportation – Third quarter of 2007 compared with 2006

	Quarter Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Revenue	$	259.9		$	243.2		7	%
Operating profit	$	38.6		$	34.2		13	%
Operating profit margin		14.9	%		14.1	%
Volume (Units)
Hawaii containers		42,900			44,600		-4	%
Hawaii automobiles		30,800			27,100		14	%
China containers		12,500			10,200		23	%
Guam containers*		3,600			3,300		9	%

* Container volumes related to the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) have been excluded for comparative purposes due to the Company’s new deployment in the Guam and Micronesia trades.

Ocean Transportation revenue for the third quarter of 2007 increased $16.7 million, or 7 percent, compared with the third quarter of 2006. Of this increase, approximately $9.3 million was due to improved yields and cargo mix, $5.8 million was due to overall volume increases for Matson’s services, and $3.4 million was due to increases in fuel surcharge revenues. These increases were partially offset by approximately $1.7 million in lower purchased transportation revenue.

Total Hawaii container volume was down 4 percent from the third quarter of 2006, reflecting a continuation of the moderation in the rate of growth for the Hawaii economy. Matson’s Hawaii automobile volume for the quarter was 14 percent higher than the third quarter of last year, due primarily to timing of rental car companies’ replacement cycles, which resulted in higher new rental car shipments to Hawaii and higher rental car returns to the U.S. mainland. China container volume increased 23 percent in the third quarter of 2007, compared with the third quarter of 2006, primarily due to the maturation of the China service subsequent to the third quarter of 2006. Guam container volume increased 9 percent from year-earlier levels due to general market growth.

Operating profit for the third quarter of 2007 increased $4.4 million, or 13 percent, compared with the third quarter of 2006. This increase was primarily the result of revenue increases described above, partially offset by the following operating expense changes. Vessel costs increased $5.2 million, primarily due to higher fuel costs, higher insurance and claims costs, as well as higher vessel wages. Additionally, outside transportation costs increased by $3.4 million due to the removal of a barge from service for dry-docking, terminal handling costs increased $3.1 million due principally to higher containerization costs as a result of higher auto volumes and increased rates, and general and administrative expenses increased $2.1 million, due primarily to higher performance-based incentive

accruals, professional fees, and legal expenses. These cost increases were partially offset by $2.1 million in lower operations overhead costs, principally the result of lower container repositioning costs.

Matson’s operating margin of 14.9% for the quarter was higher than historical averages, principally due to yield improvement and cost containment initiatives. Matson expects operating margins to moderate, in line with historical levels, for the balance of the year.

Ocean Transportation – First nine months of 2007 compared with 2006

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Revenue	$	744.6		$	706.1		5	%
Operating profit	$	96.5		$	76.9		25	%
Operating profit margin		13.0	%		10.9	%
Volume (Units)
Hawaii containers		126,000			131,000		-4	%
Hawaii automobiles		76,900			92,700		-17	%
China containers		38,000			19,700		93	%
Guam containers*		10,700			10,100		6	%

* Container volumes related to the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) have been excluded for comparative purposes due to the Company’s new deployment in the Guam and Micronesia trades.

Ocean Transportation revenue for the first nine months of 2007 increased $38.5 million, or 5 percent, compared with the same period in 2006. Of this increase, approximately $29.3 million was due to improved yields and cargo mix, $15.7 million was due to an overall container volume increase for Matson’s services, and $9.7 million was due to an increase in fuel surcharge revenues. These increases were partially offset by $9.7 million in lower auto volumes, $6.4 million of lower vessel charter revenue resulting from the expiration of the APL Alliance in the first quarter of 2006 and $3.2 million in lower government charter service revenue.

Matson’s Hawaii automobile volume for the first nine months of 2007 was 17 percent lower than the same period of last year, due primarily to lower rental fleet turnover, in the first half of the year, and slower retail auto sales. Hawaii and Guam container volume changes were due to the same factors cited for the quarter. China volume increased in 2007 as a result of ramp-up of the service during 2006.

Operating profit for the first nine months of 2007 increased $19.6 million, or 25 percent, compared with the same period in 2006. This increase was primarily the result of revenue increases described above, partially offset by the following operating expense changes. Terminal handling costs increased by $6.2 million, principally the result of higher rates, operations overhead increased $5.9 million, primarily due to higher container repositioning costs arising as a result of increased China volumes destined for inland U.S. locations, depreciation expenses increased $5.4 million due principally to the acquisition of a new vessel late in the third quarter of 2006, outside transportation costs increased by $3.8 million due principally to the dry-docking of a barge, general and administrative costs increased

$3.4 million due to the same factors cited for the quarter, and vessel costs increased by $1.1 million due principally to significantly higher direct and indirect fuel costs, partially offset by lower vessel operating expenses primarily due to reduced vessel voyages resulting from the management of ship usage based on cargo requirements, lower charter costs, and lower inactive vessel costs. The year-over-year variance was also negatively impacted by a $3.3 million gain in 2006 on the sale of two surplus and obsolete vessels.

Logistics Services – Third quarter of 2007 compared with 2006

	Quarter Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Intermodal revenue	$	71.7		$	76.0		-6	%
Highway revenue		38.7			37.1		4	%
Total Revenue	$	110.4		$	113.1		-2	%
Operating profit	$	6.0		$	5.1		18	%
Operating profit margin		5.4	%		4.5	%

Logistics revenue for the third quarter of 2007 was $2.7 million, or 2 percent, lower than the third quarter of 2006. This change was principally due to a 6 percent decrease in Intermodal revenue, but was partially offset by a 4 percent increase in Highway revenue. Intermodal revenue decreased as a result of softening volumes across the intermodal market, but was partially offset by improved rates. Highway revenue increased primarily due to increased expedited service volumes, but was partially offset by lower Highway rates and non-expedited volumes.

Logistics operating profit for the third quarter of 2007 was $0.9 million, or 18 percent, higher than the third quarter of 2006. The operating profit margin percentage increased to 5.4% in 2007 from 4.5% in 2006 due to an increase in income related to a decrease in certain current liabilities, lower provision for bad debts, and higher expedited volume, partially offset by lower Intermodal and non-expedited Highway volumes and higher general and administrative expenses.

Logistics Services – First nine months of 2007 compared with 2006

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Intermodal revenue	$	209.8		$	216.9		-3	%
Highway revenue		115.9			121.0		-4	%
Total Revenue	$	325.7		$	337.9		-4	%
Operating profit	$	17.2		$	15.1		14	%
Operating profit margin		5.3	%		4.5	%

Logistics revenue for the first nine months of 2007 was $12.2 million, or 4 percent, lower than the same period in 2006. This change was principally due to decreases in Highway and Intermodal

revenue of 4 percent and 3 percent, respectively. The decrease in Intermodal revenue was attributable to the same factors cited for the quarter. The decrease in Highway revenues was due principally to the loss of a truck brokerage agent in Minnesota through an acquisition by a competitor.

Logistics operating profit for the first nine months of 2007 was $2.1 million, or 14 percent, higher than the same period in 2006. The operating profit improvement was due to the same factors cited for the quarter increase as well as various margin improvement efforts in both Highway and Intermodal businesses, partially offset by lower overall volumes and higher general and administrative expenses.

REAL ESTATE BUSINESS

Real estate leasing and sales revenue and operating profit are analyzed before subtracting amounts related to discontinued operations. This is consistent with how the Company’s management evaluates and makes decisions regarding capital allocation for the Company’s real estate businesses. A discussion of discontinued operations for the real estate business is included separately.

Effect of Property Sales Mix on Operating Results: Direct year-over-year comparison of the real estate sales results may not provide a consistent, measurable barometer of future performance because results from period to period are significantly affected by joint venture income and the mix of property sales. Operating results, by virtue of each project’s asset class, geography, and timing, are inherently episodic. Earnings from joint venture investments are not included in segment revenue, but are included in operating profit. The mix of real estate sales in any year or quarter can be diverse and can include developed residential real estate, commercial properties, developable subdivision lots, undeveloped land, and property sold under threat of condemnation. The sale of undeveloped land and vacant parcels in Hawaii generally provides a greater contribution to earnings than does the sale of developed and commercial property, due to the low historical-cost basis of the Company’s Hawaii land. Consequently, real estate sales revenue trends, cash flows from the sales of real estate, and the amount of real estate held for sale on the balance sheets do not necessarily indicate future profitability trends for this segment. Additionally, the operating profit reported in each quarter does not necessarily follow a percentage of sales trends because the cost basis of property sold can differ significantly between transactions. The reporting of real estate sales is also affected by the classification of certain real estate sales as discontinued operations.

Real Estate Leasing – Third quarter of 2007 compared with 2006

	Quarter Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Revenue	$	26.3		$	25.5		3	%
Operating profit	$	12.2		$	12.5		-2	%
Operating profit margin		46.4	%		49.0	%
Occupancy Rates:
Mainland		97	%		97	%	--	%
Hawaii		98	%		98	%	--	%
Leasable Space (million sq. ft.):
Mainland		3.9			3.7		5	%
Hawaii		1.4			1.6		-13	%

Real estate leasing revenue and operating profit for the third quarter of 2007, before subtracting amounts treated as discontinued operations, were 3 percent higher and 2 percent lower, respectively, than the amounts reported for the third quarter of 2006. The higher leasing revenue in the third quarter of 2007 was primarily due to higher rents on existing properties, partially offset by a business interruption claim related to rent revenue received in 2006. The increase in revenue from the acquisition of two properties (during or subsequent to the third quarter of 2006) was largely offset by the sale of two commercial properties (during or subsequent to the third quarter of 2006).

Despite higher leasing revenue, operating profit in the third quarter of 2007 was lower than the same period in 2006 due to a business interruption claim that was received in 2006, higher general and administrative costs, and higher real property tax, depreciation, and utility costs. The unfavorable change to operating profit was partially offset by the positive margin contribution resulting from net property acquisitions and dispositions that occurred during or subsequent to the third quarter of 2006.

Real Estate Leasing – First nine months of 2007 compared with 2006

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Revenue	$	81.5		$	74.5		9	%
Operating profit	$	39.5		$	36.8		7	%
Operating profit margin		48.5	%		49.4	%
Occupancy Rates:
Mainland		97	%		97	%	--	%
Hawaii		98	%		98	%	--	%

Real estate leasing revenue and operating profit for the first nine months of 2007 were 9 percent and 7 percent higher, respectively, than the amounts reported for the first nine months of 2006. The increase in real estate leasing revenue was principally due to five new property acquisitions, partially

offset by seven property dispositions, during or subsequent to the first nine months of 2006, $1.7 million of nonrecurring items recorded in the first quarter of 2007, the completion and occupancy of a commercial building on Maui in October 2006, and improved performance at existing properties, partially offset by a business interruption claim related to rent revenue received in 2006.

Operating profit increased in the first nine months of 2007, compared with the same period in 2006, for the same reasons cited for the real estate leasing revenue increases, but the increases were partially offset by higher 2006 interest income on exchange proceeds.

Real Estate Sales – Third quarter and first nine months of 2007 compared with 2006

	Quarter Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007		2006			Change
Improved property sales	$	73.6	$	--		NM
Development sales		4.2		0.9		5	X
Unimproved/other property sales		0.7		4.1		-83	%
Total revenue	$	78.5	$	5.0		16	X
Operating profit before joint ventures	$	33.9	$	2.6		13	X
Earnings from joint ventures		4.0		(1.4	)	NM
Total operating profit	$	37.9	$	1.2		32	X

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007		2006		Change
Improved property sales	$	73.6	$	51.3	43	%
Development sales		4.2		1.5	3	X
Unimproved/other property sales		7.6		12.8	-41	%
Total revenue	$	85.4	$	65.6	30	%
Operating profit before joint ventures	$	35.7	$	28.4	26	%
Earnings from joint ventures		15.6		10.8	44	%
Total operating profit	$	51.3	$	39.2	31	%

The higher third quarter and nine months revenue and operating profit results were due to the mix and timing of real estate sales in 2007 compared with 2006. The composition of these sales is described below.

2007 Third Quarter: Real estate sales revenue, before subtracting amounts treated as discontinued operations, was $78.5 million. In the third quarter of 2007, the Company closed the sale of a four-acre land parcel ground leased to a retail tenant in Honolulu and two retail centers on Maui. Closings also commenced on a single-family residential development on Kauai. Operating profit of $37.9 million for the third quarter of 2007 included the margin on the sales referenced above as well as $4.0 million of joint venture earnings, principally representing the Company’s share of earnings (which

are not included in revenue for the segment) related to sales at the Company’s Kai Malu residential joint venture development on Maui.

2007 - Nine Months Ended September 30: Revenue for the first nine months of 2007 included the sales referenced above and first quarter revenue of $6.5 million principally related to the final payment on an installment sale of an agricultural parcel on Kauai. Operating profit for the first nine months of 2007 included $15.6 million for the Company’s earnings from its real estate joint ventures, generated principally from the Kai Malu and Centre Pointe joint venture projects, partially offset by the Company’s share of marketing and other operating expenses of the Kukui’ula joint venture project.

2006 Third Quarter: Real estate sales revenue, before subtracting amounts treated as discontinued operations, was $5.0 million and consisted of the sale of several commercial parcels and one agricultural parcel in Hawaii. Operating profit for the third quarter of 2006 included a loss of $1.4 million, primarily related to the Company’s share of marketing and other operating expenses of its real estate joint ventures.

2006 - Nine Months Ended September 30: Real estate sales revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 included first half revenue of $60.6 million, generated principally by the sale of two retail centers in Phoenix, Arizona, a Maui office building, several commercial parcels on Maui, a commercial property on Oahu, and a vacant parcel on Kauai. Operating profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 included $10.8 million of joint venture earnings that principally related to a portion of the Company’s earnings from its Hokua joint venture, which completed sales of all 247 residential condominium units in the first quarter of 2006.

Real Estate Discontinued Operations – 2007 compared with 2006

The revenue and operating profit on real estate discontinued operations for the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

	Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
(dollars in millions, before tax)	2007		2006		2007		2006
Sales revenue	$	73.5	$	2.3	$	73.6	$	62.1
Leasing revenue	$	1.8	$	2.4	$	5.6	$	9.1
Sales operating profit	$	35.0	$	2.4	$	35.1	$	32.4
Leasing operating profit	$	1.1	$	1.4	$	3.5	$	5.4

2007: The revenue and expenses of land leased to a retail tenant on Oahu and two commercial properties on Maui and have been classified as discontinued operations. In addition, two additional commercial properties on Maui and a commercial property in California have been classified as discontinued operations because of the Company’s plan to sell these properties.

2006: The revenue and operating profit of two retail centers in Phoenix, Arizona, an office building on Maui, and several commercial parcels in Hawaii were included in discontinued operations.

The leasing revenue and operating profit noted above includes the results for properties that were sold through September 30, 2007 and the operating results of two commercial properties on the island of Maui and a commercial property in California that the Company intends to sell within the next 12 months. The leasing revenue and operating profit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 have been restated to reflect properties that were classified as discontinued operations subsequent to September 30, 2006.

AGRIBUSINESS

The operating results of the Agribusiness segment are highly dependent on a number of factors, including seasonality and weather conditions. Weather conditions represent one of the most important factors affecting operating results because weather conditions affects yields, volume of electricity generation, plantings, harvesting, and factory operations. Consequently, operating results from the Agribusiness segment will vary from period to period.

Agribusiness – Third quarter of 2007 compared with 2006

	Quarter Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Revenue	$	37.3		$	41.8		-11	%
Operating profit (loss)	$	(3.2	)	$	0.6		NM
Operating profit margin		-8.6	%		1.4	%
Tons sugar produced		58,300			68,500		-15	%

Agribusiness revenue for the third quarter of 2007 decreased $4.5 million, or 11 percent, compared with the third quarter of 2006. The decrease was due mainly to $4.7 million in lower bulk raw sugar revenue due principally to lower sales volume.

Operating profit (loss) for the third quarter of 2007 decreased $3.8 million compared with the third quarter of 2006. The decrease was principally due to $3.3 million in lower raw sugar margins, a result of higher production costs per ton, which is due principally to production volumes that are expected to be lower for the full year than originally anticipated.

Agribusiness – First nine months of 2007 compared with 2006

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change
Revenue	$	93.1		$	95.1		-2	%
Operating profit	$	0.9		$	10.2		-91	%
Operating profit margin		1.0	%		10.7	%
Tons sugar produced		130,500			130,700		--	%

Agribusiness revenue for the first nine months of 2007 decreased $2.0 million, or 2 percent, compared with the same period in 2006. The decrease was principally due to $3.6 million in lower bulk raw sugar revenue as a result of lower sugar prices and sales volumes, and $2.0 million in lower power revenue due principally to lower volumes sold, partially offset by $3.6 million in higher revenue from trucking and shop services, quarry royalties, coffee sales, and specialty sugar sales.

Operating profit for the first nine months of 2007 decreased $9.3 million, or 91 percent, compared with the same period in 2006. The decrease in operating profit was primarily due to $7.8 million in lower raw sugar margins, resulting from higher production costs per ton, which is due principally to production volumes that are expected to be lower for the year than originally anticipated, and to lower sugar prices. The decrease in operating profit was also due to $2.1 million in lower power sales margins, principally the result of lower volumes.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview: Cash flows provided by operating activities continue to be the Company’s most significant source of liquidity. Additional sources of liquidity were provided by available cash and cash equivalent balances as well as borrowings on available credit facilities.

Cash Flows: Cash Flows from Operating Activities totaled $78 million for the first nine months of 2007, compared with $85 million for the first nine months of 2006. This decrease was due principally to higher 2007 expenditures on real estate developments, principally for the construction of the Keola Lai condominium project, as well as proceeds from the return on the Company’s investment in its Hokua joint venture development project that were received in the first quarter of 2006. These factors more than offset higher 2007 earnings.

Cash Flows used in Investing Activities totaled $87 million for the first nine months of 2007, compared with $105 million used in the first nine months of 2006. The decrease was due principally to $183 million of lower capital expenditures in 2007, partially offset by net deposits to the Capital Construction Fund – as compared to significant net withdrawals in 2006 – and lower proceeds from investments, principally due to the 2006 return of capital from the Hokua joint venture.

Capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2007 totaled $72 million compared with $255 million for the first nine months of 2006. The 2007 expenditures included $51 million for the purchase of ocean transportation-related assets, $8 million for real estate related acquisitions, development and property improvements, and $13 million related to agricultural operations. The $72 million reported in Capital Expenditures on the Statement of Cash Flows for 2007 excludes $12 million of tax-deferred purchases since the Company did not actually take control of the cash during the exchange period. Capital expenditures for 2006 included $209 million for the purchase of ocean transportation-related assets, primarily related to the new China service, $31 million for real estate related acquisitions, development, and property improvements, and $9 million of routine asset replacements for agricultural operations. The 2006 amounts reported in Capital Expenditures on the Statement of Cash Flows excluded $33 million of tax-deferred purchases.

Cash Flows used in Financing Activities were $7 million for the first nine months of 2007, compared with $7 million provided during the first nine months of 2006. The $14 million decrease in cash flows from Financing Activities was principally due to $74 million in lower net borrowings on the Company’s debt facilities in 2007 as compared to 2006, partially offset by $60 million in higher share repurchases in 2006 than in 2007.

The Company believes that funds generated from results of operations, available cash and cash equivalents, and available borrowings under credit facilities will be sufficient to finance the Company’s business requirements for the next fiscal year, including working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, and potential acquisitions and stock repurchases. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that it will be able to maintain its ability to borrow under its available credit facilities.

Sources of Liquidity: Funds generated by operating activities continue to be the Company’s most significant source of liquidity. Additional sources of liquidity for the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and sugar and coffee inventories that totaled $224 million at September 30, 2007, a decrease of $6 million from December 31, 2006. The decrease was due primarily to $16 million of lower cash balances, partially offset by $8 million in higher receivable balances and $3 million in higher sugar and coffee inventory balances. These fluctuations are due to normal operating activities.

The Company also has various revolving credit and term facilities that provide additional sources of liquidity for working capital requirements or investment opportunities on a short-term as well as longer-term basis. As of September 30, 2007, available borrowings under these facilities totaled $426 million.

Balance Sheet: Working capital was $23 million at September 30, 2007, a decrease of $5 million from the balance carried at the end of 2006. The decrease in working capital was due primarily to higher accounts payable balances.

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $29 million at the end of the third quarter compared with $45 million at the beginning of the year. The lower cash balance is due principally to dividends paid, capital expenditures, contributions to joint venture investments, and repurchases of stock, partially offset by cash from operations and debt borrowings.

Long-term Debt, including current portion, totaled $476 million at September 30, 2007 compared with a balance of $442 million at December 31, 2006. This $34 million increase was due mainly to borrowings used for capital expenditures.

Tax-Deferred Real Estate Exchanges: Sales – During the third quarter of 2007, there were sales of three leased properties totaling $72.1 million that qualified for potential tax-deferral treatment under the Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 (the “Code”). As of September 30, 2007, $72.1 million of proceeds had not been reinvested. The proceeds must be reinvested in qualifying property within 180 days from the date of the sale in order to qualify for tax deferral treatment under the Code.

Purchases – There were no purchases during the third quarter of 2007 that utilized tax deferred funds.

The proceeds from 1031 tax-deferred sales are held in escrow pending future use to purchase new real estate assets. The proceeds from 1033 condemnations are held by the Company until the funds are redeployed.

The funds related to 1031 transactions are not included in the Statement of Cash Flows but are included as non-cash activities below the Statement. For “reverse 1031” transactions, the Company purchases a property in anticipation of receiving funds from a future property sale. Funds used for reverse 1031 purchases are included as capital expenditures on the Statement of Cash Flows and the related sales of property, for which the proceeds are linked, are included as property sales in the Statement.

Commitments, Contingencies and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements: The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The Company has not provided a detailed estimate of the timing of payments due to the uncertainty of when the related tax settlements are due. A description of other commitments, contingencies, and off-balance sheet arrangements at September 30, 2007 is described in Note 3 to the financial statements of Item 1 in this Form 10-Q.

BUSINESS OUTLOOK

Transportation: For 2007, Matson expects its full-year operating profit to be significantly higher than 2006, based on the full-year impact and strength of its established China-Long Beach service and the strengthening Guam market.

Total Hawaii container volumes have been, and are expected to be, modestly lower than the prior year. Matson’s westbound Hawaii service container volume increased marginally in the third quarter of 2007, and is forecast to be flat in the fourth quarter, as compared to levels achieved in the same period of 2006. Eastbound container volume, which represents less than one-eighth of total Hawaii container volume, is expected to decrease in the fourth quarter and for the full year. While auto volumes were seasonally stronger in the third quarter of 2007, the Company does not expect that a return toward the higher volumes of preceding years will be achieved in the near-term.

The growth of Matson’s China-Long Beach service volume more than offset the moderating volume in the Hawaii market in the third quarter of 2007. Additionally, Matson’s China service advantage has provided meaningful rate and yield improvements that were favorably reflected in the results for the quarter. Matson expects that the favorable rate improvements will remain for the balance of the year. For the fourth quarter of 2007, Matson forecasts sustained, robust volumes, and expects that its ships will be effectively full, mirroring its volumes from the same period of the prior year.

Ocean Transportation financial performance for the fourth quarter of 2007 will be affected by cost increases related to contractual increases, higher Hawaii labor benefits, and increases in container terminal costs. The impact of these increases is expected to result in modestly to moderately lower financial performance in the fourth quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in the prior year.

For the fourth quarter of 2007, Matson Integrated Logistics (“MIL”) expects the volume environment to remain challenging, which is expected to unfavorably impact its financial performance in comparison to the same period from the prior year. Therefore, MIL expects only moderate improvement in its financial performance for the full year and expects margins in the fourth quarter to moderate from the high levels experienced in recent periods.

Real Estate: The real estate leasing portfolio continues to exhibit strong performance as occupancies remain at high levels. For the fourth quarter of 2007, existing high occupancy levels are expected to continue, although earnings are expected to be lower, compared to the same period in 2006, due in part to third quarter property sales, and various favorable non-recurring items that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2006. As a result, the year-over-year improvement for the real estate leasing portfolio is expected to be moderate.

Performance of the real estate sales segment in the third quarter of 2007 was significantly higher than the third quarter of 2006 due to the timing of property sales, which are inherently episodic. For the fourth quarter of 2007, given anticipated commercial property and residential real estate sales, the Company projects favorable year-over-year comparisons. For the full-year, the Company projects strong year-over-year growth.

Agribusiness: Unfavorable weather conditions have continued to negatively impact sugar yields in the third quarter of 2007, resulting in a loss in the third quarter of 2007. As a result, while the Company expects a favorable year-over-year comparison for the fourth quarter of 2007 versus the same period in 2006, the Company also expects nominal profitability for the full year.

OTHER MATTERS

Share Repurchases: During the third quarter, the Company repurchased 262,882 shares at an average price of $48.99 through open market purchases. As of September 30, 2007, approximately 1,737,000 shares remain available for repurchase under a two million share authorization that was approved by the A&B Board of Directors in October 2006. This authorization expires December 31, 2008.

Dividends: On April 25, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a 16% increase in the quarterly dividend from $0.25 per share to $0.29 per share, effective with the second quarter of 2007. On June 28, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors announced a third-quarter 2007 dividend of $0.29 per share, payable on September 6, 2007 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 2, 2007. On October 25, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a fourth-quarter 2007 dividend of $0.29 per share, payable on December 6, 2007 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 8, 2007.

Significant Accounting Policies: The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of the Company’s most recently filed Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, upon which the Management’s Discussion and Analysis is based, requires that management exercise judgment when making estimates and assumptions about future events that may affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty and actual results will, inevitably, differ from those critical accounting estimates. These differences could be material. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of A&B’s financial statements were described in Item 7 of the Company’s most recently filed Form 10-K.

Economic Conditions: Two primary sources of periodic economic forecasts for the State of Hawaii are the University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization (UHERO) and the state’s Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism (DBEDT). Forecasts from these independent organizations suggest that the economic rate of growth has moderated, but remains positive for the rest of the year and into 2008.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Information concerning market risk is incorporated herein by reference to Item 7A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. There has been no material change in the quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk since December 31, 2006.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b)

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In connection with the complaint filed by the Government of Guam with the Surface Transportation Board (the “Board”) against Matson in 1998, the Board, on August 30, 2007, denied the Government of Guam’s petition for reconsideration of the Board’s February 2, 2007 decision. As a result, the Government of Guam filed a motion to dismiss its complaint on September 18, 2007. The Board issued a decision dismissing the complaint on October 12, 2007.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Jul 1 – 31, 2007	520 (1)	52.51	--	--
Aug 1 – 31, 2007	157,268	49.05	157,268	1,842,732 (2)
Sep 1 – 30, 2007	105,614	48.90	105,614	1,737,118 (2)

(1) Represents shares accepted in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of non-vested common stock.

(2) The Company has a continuing share repurchase program (approved in October 2006) under which the Company may repurchase shares of common stock in either open market or private transactions. The share repurchase authorization expires December 31, 2008. See Note 10 included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional information related to share repurchases that occurred subsequent to September 30, 2007.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

10.a.(xxx) Amendment No. 1 dated September 21, 2007, to Security Agreement between Matson Navigation Company, Inc. and the United States of America, with respect to $55 million of Title XI ship financing bonds, dated July 29, 2004.

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
		(Registrant)



Date: October 26, 2007		/s/ Christopher J. Benjamin
		Christopher J. Benjamin
		Senior Vice President,
		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



Date: October 26, 2007		/s/ Paul K. Ito
		Paul K. Ito
		Vice President, Controller and
		Assistant Treasurer

EXHIBIT INDEX

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

AMENDMENT No. 1

To Security Agreement

(Contract No. MA-13897)

This amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the 21st day of Sept., 2007 between Matson Navigation Company, Inc., a Hawaii Corporation (the “Shipowner”) and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, represented by the Secretary of Transportation, acting by and through the Maritime Administrator (the “Secretary”).

WHEREAS; the Shipowner and the Secretary entered into a Security Agreement (Contract No. MA-13897) dated July 29, 2004 (the “MAUNAWILI Security Agreement”), in connection with certain United States Government Guaranteed Ship Financing Bonds issued by the Shipowner to finance the vessel MAUNAWILI owned by the Shipowner;

WHEREAS; Schedule X to the MAUNAWILI Security Agreement is a schedule of Definitions (the “MAUNAWILI Schedule of Definitions”) used in the MAUNAWILI Security Agreement:

WHEREAS; the parties hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the MAUNAWILI Schedule of Definitions.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Shipowner and the Secretary hereby agree that, effective as of the date hereof,

1. The definition of “Long Term Debt” appearing in the MAUNAWILI Schedule of Definitions shall be amended by inserting a comma (“,”) before the period (“.”) at the end of the last sentence followed by the words “and funds available to Matson to be drawn down under long-term borrowings (greater than 12 months) under credit facilities maintained by Matson at the time to the extent that such available funds are included in current assets in determining minimum compliance with the Working Capital requirement contained Section 8(b)(i) of the Financial Agreement.”

2. Clause (1) of the definition of “Working Capital” appearing in the MAUNAWILI Schedule of Definitions shall be amended by inserting the words “(i) there shall also be included, funds available to Matson to be drawn down under long-term borrowings (greater than 12 months) under credit facilities maintained by Matson at the time, and (ii)” after the words “In determining current assets” and before the words “there shall also be deducted: (A) Any securities,” in the first line of such clause.

3. Except as amended hereby, all other provisions of the MAUNAWILI Schedule of Definitions shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above written.

MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC.

By: /s/ Timothy H. Reid

Name: Timothy H. Reid

Its: Treasurer

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION

Attest:

MARITIME ADMINISTRATOR

/s/ Larry Main

By: /s/ Daron Threet

Assistant Secretary

Maritime Administration

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Christopher J. Benjamin, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Christopher J. Benjamin

Christopher J. Benjamin, Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: October 26, 2007

EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), W. Allen Doane, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Christopher J. Benjamin, as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ W. Allen Doane

Name:

W. Allen Doane

Title:

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:

October 26, 2007

/s/ Christopher J. Benjamin

Name:

Christopher J. Benjamin

Title:

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:

October 26, 2007

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, W. Allen Doane, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.;

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ W. Allen Doane

W. Allen Doane, Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Date:

October 26, 2007